AIML-06

Home
Scope
Dates
Committee
Submission
Registration
Accommodation
Contact
Special Sessions
Specific Topics
Venue
Participants

ICGST International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIML-06)

        

13 - 15 June 2006, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, aiml06@icgst.com

Venue: Sharm Hilton Dreams

AIML-06 Submission

General templates and the referee's report of AIML-06.

Prospective authors should submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript by email to aiml06@icgst.com, according to the mentioned timetable.  

Review:

Submitted papers are evaluated by the editors and those judged as presenting potentially significant research contributions within the scope of the conference are formally reviewed. Suitability for publication is based on relevance to the overall AIML 06 goals, rules, originality, technical quality, importance, scientific contribution, and readability. Authors receive detailed reports about their articles accompanied with the notification of acceptance, modification or rejection.

ICGST submission rules:

  • Your paper (up to 2 MB) has to be submitted via email as MS Word or LaTeX format.
  • The figures can be included or separate submitted in standard eps 600 DPI graphic format.
  • Please, avoid too dark figures and black backgrounds.
  • All papers have to be submitted electronically, except by prior arrangement with AIML 06.
  • All articles will be reviewed according to AIML 06 rules.
  • We will reedit the final manuscript by ourself to suit our standard format.
  • Your paper must be registered and fully paid before publishing.
  • Authors are asked to write author ID (AID) and paper ID (PID) within the subject of their correspondence.
  • AIML 06 publications are copyright protected according to ICGST copyright rules.
  • The normal publishing rate is considered for 6 pages papers and the excess-page charge for longer papers.
  • All papers are printed in grayscale colors, except by prior arrangement with AIML 06.

ICGST review rules:

  • Originality and scientific contribution 60% (3 reviewers)
  • Paper language and readability 20% (single reviewer)
  • Paper organizing and technical quality 20% (single reviewer)
  • Best paper award (special review and voting rules)
Review rating rules:
  • Originality [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Significance [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Quality [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Relevance [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Expertise [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Presentation [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Language [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Overall grade [Excellent, very good, good, fair, weak, rejected]
  • Accepted [yes, no]
  • Award [yes, no]